Influence
January 14, 2025

Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Sarah Wiehe, MD

Published in JAMA. Here is a link to the article.

Regenstrief Institute authors: Sarah Wiehe, MD, MPH

Abstract

Importance: Osteoporotic fractures are associated with psychological distress, subsequent fractures, loss of independence, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, and death.

Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures in adults 40 years or older with no known diagnosis of osteoporosis or history of fragility fracture.

Population: Adults 40 years or older without known osteoporosis or history of fragility fractures.

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men cannot be determined.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years who are at increased risk for an osteoporotic fracture as estimated by clinical risk assessment. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men. (I statement).

US Preventive Services Task ForceWanda K Nicholson 1Michael Silverstein 2John B Wong 3David Chelmow 4Tumaini Rucker Coker 5Esa M Davis 6Carlos Roberto Jaén 7Marie Krousel-Wood 8Sei Lee 9Li Li 10Carol M Mangione 11Gbenga Ogedegbe 12Goutham Rao 13John M Ruiz 14James Stevermer 15Joel Tsevat 7Sandra Millon Underwood 16Sarah Wiehe 17

Affiliations

1George Washington University, Washington, DC.

2Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

3Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

4Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

5University of Washington, Seattle.

6University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.

7University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

8Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

9University of California, San Francisco.

10University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

11University of California, Los Angeles.

12New York University, New York, New York.

13Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

14University of Arizona, Tucson.

15University of Missouri, Columbia.

16University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

17Indiana University, Bloomington.

Related News

LOINC® and Health Data Standards receive additional funding to address health disparities in EHRs

LOINC® and Health Data Standards receive additional funding to address health disparities in EHRs

Regenstrief Institute and the Health Data Standards (HDS) team, the stewards of LOINC®, have received an additional $500,000 in

photo of nursing home worker working a puzzle with an elderly woman

Assessing pain, anxiety and other symptoms of nursing home residents unable to speak for themselves

Revamped tool reliably addresses physical and emotional distress, well-being and end-of-life symptoms INDIANAPOLIS – As many as half of