News
December 16, 2019

Hospital patient portals lack specific and informative instructions for patients

infographic about hospital patient portal guidance

Most hospitals in the United States, but not all, have secure online websites called patient portals that give patients access to their personal health information. However, many hospitals fail to inform patients fully about using the portals, according to new research from Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University School of Medicine.

Patient portals offer the opportunity to expand people’s access to both their own health information and communication with their clinicians. A federal law, known as the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, has provided financial incentives for healthcare providers to adopt these portals, and patients’ access to them has increased significantly over the last ten years. Clinicians, however, say they are concerned about patients misusing the portals, especially when it comes to electronic messages. Likewise, patients have expressed a desire for more guidance on using portals and secure messaging.

The goal of the new study, the most recent in Regenstrief Institute’s extensive work in the field of doctor-patient communications, was to determine the availability of hospital portals in the U.S. and what instructions were given to patients about using them. Researchers found:

  • Portal instructions were more focused on operational and legal information, like how to sign on and liability limits, than on instructing the patient on what medical circumstances are best suited for portal use.
  • More than half of portals with secure messaging did not have available guidance describing the appropriate uses of messages and practices relating to them. Many had generic statements describing secure messaging, such as “send and receive messages from staff,” but included no information on what message content would be considered appropriate.
  • Some guidance used complicated language and vocabulary, which may hinder understanding by a general audience.

“We found that many instructional materials had more of a medicolegal focus, rather than a focus on the patient as a user,” said Joy L. Lee, PhD, M.S., Regenstrief research scientist and lead author of the paper. “This research indicates there is room for improvement when it comes to educating patients on the portals, especially related to secure messaging. The guidance that exists includes a lot of ‘don’ts’, but not very many ‘dos’. This makes it difficult for patients to properly utilize and benefit from the service.”

Content of patient portal guidance

Dr. Lee and the research team collected information from a random sample of 200 acute-care hospitals from across the U.S. The study team accessed publicly available portal information from hospital websites and called the hospitals to request any additional information that was distributed to patients about portals or messaging. Then they read and analyzed the content.

Some key results of the analysis were:

  • Only 89 percent of hospitals had patient portals
  • 66 percent of patient portals included secure messaging
  • 58 percent of secure messaging portals did not detail how the patient was supposed to use the messaging.

Many hospitals included disclaimers that the messaging was not for emergencies, however, 23 included that inside the “Terms and Conditions” section, which few patients may actually read.

“Hospitals and healthcare systems have invested a lot of money in patient portals, but the investment won’t pay off for them or the people they provide care for if patients are confused about how to use the portals or don’t understand how to get the most out of the tool,” said Dr. Lee.

“Hospitals and health systems are expanding their uses and provision of online resources, including patient portals,” said Michael Weiner, M.D., MPH, senior author of the article and associate director of Regenstrief Institute’s William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research. “Health systems need to be active participants in engaging patients, providing them with more and better information, and clarifying expectations. As guidance is developed at a system level, clinicians can also guide conversations with their patients about how to use messaging tools.”

Study authors add that while many instructions could be improved, several good examples of complete and informative patient guidance do exist.

The paper “Too Many Don’ts and Not Enough Do’s? A Survey of Hospitals About Their Portal Instructions for Patients” was published online ahead of print in the Journal of General Internal Medicine on November 12. The research was funded in part by the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, by grants UL1TR001108 and UL1TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award.

Additional authors of the article are Claire E. Williams and Sean Baird from Regenstrief Institute and Marianne S. Matthias, PhD, research scientist at Regenstrief, associate professor and director of graduate studies in the Department of Communication Studies at IUPUI and core investigator at VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center.

About Regenstrief Institute

Founded in 1969 in Indianapolis, the Regenstrief Institute is a local, national and global leader dedicated to a world where better information empowers people to end disease and realize true health. The Regenstrief Institute, a key research partner to Indiana University, and its researchers are responsible for a growing number of major healthcare innovations and studies. Examples range from the development of global health information technology standards that enable the use and interoperability of electronic health records to improving patient-physician communications, to creating models of care that inform practice and improve the lives of patients around the globe.

Regenstrief Institute is celebrating 50 years of healthcare innovation. Sam Regenstrief, a successful entrepreneur from Connersville, Indiana, founded the institute with the goal of making healthcare more efficient and accessible for everyone. His vision continues to guide the institute’s research mission.

More about Joy L. Lee, PhD

In addition to her role as a research scientist at Regenstrief Institute, Joy L. Lee, PhD, is an assistant professor of medicine at IU School of Medicine.

More about Michael Weiner, M.D., MPH

Michael Weiner, M.D., MPH, is the associate director of Regenstrief Institute William M. Tierney Center for Health Services Research, principal investigator and director at VA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center and a professor of medicine at IU School of Medicine.

Related News

IU announces $138 million Lilly Endowment grant, launches partnership to accelerate bioscience innovation

IU announces $138 million Lilly Endowment grant, launches partnership to accelerate bioscience innovation

Regenstrief one of the partners expected to drive advancements and commercialization in biosciences  Regenstrief Institute will partner with Indiana

Thomas Imperiale, MD

Is the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Just a Better “FIT” for Colorectal Cancer Screening?

Published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Here is a link to the article. Regenstrief Institute authors: Tom Imperiale,

Alexia Torke, MD, MS, and George Fitchett, DMin, PhD

Caring for the emotional and spiritual needs of family members of ICU patients

INDIANAPOLIS – Family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients often experience psychological and spiritual distress as they deal

Randall Grout, MD

Informaticians apply tools and techniques to eliminate ambiguity and better implement guidelines and policies in pediatric care

Policy implementation experts’ model can be reproduced and repeated, in many different practices For the last three decades, medical