News
October 4, 2021

New prediction models for colon cancer and advanced precancerous polyps are easy to use clinical and public health tools

Researchers have created novel scoring tools for predicting actual risk of colon cancer and advanced precancerous polyps for patients at average risk for the disease.

The work was led by Thomas F. Imperiale, M.D.,  Regenstrief Institute and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs research scientist and Indiana University School of Medicine professor of medicine.

The tools may be most useful in countries where colonoscopy is not routinely used for screening average risk individuals, and include Canada, the United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Australia and others which typically screen average risk individuals with less invasive sigmoidoscopy and the many countries which use no imaging tests for colon cancer screening.

The new weighted models are based on scoring various factors such as age, gender, smoking history, co-habitation history, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (for example ibuprofen) and aspirin use, and moderate physical activity over the past year in average risk individuals. These tools weigh the importance of each factor to determine an individual’s personalized risk.

“We need to more precisely measure risk of individuals and populations, so good, scientifically-based decisions about when and how to be screened for colorectal cancer can be made by patients, clinicians and public health officials,” said Dr. Imperiale, a practicing gastroenterologist who has researched colon cancer risks and screening for two decades. “Our composite, weighted scoring methods enable simple risk stratification to determine an individual’s risk, for example, of a precancerous polyp with certain ominous features or of colon cancer, both indicating a need for colonoscopy.”

He and colleagues developed two tools. One is applicable to patients who have had limited endoscopy screening of a portion of the colon with sigmoidoscopy and the other can be used for patients without any test involving visualization of the colon.

For various reasons, especially expense, and the need for patient preparation and anesthesia, many countries other than the United States, Germany and Poland do not embrace routine screening colonoscopy, preferring to use sigmoidoscopy, stool-based tests for hidden bleeding, or both. Sigmoidoscopy is a simpler procedure which only examines the lower portion of the colon (referred to medically as the distal colon) and is performed every five-to-ten years. Stool samples are inexpensive, easy to use and should be repeated annually or biennially. Predictive, data-based, tools for identifying average-risk patients at highest risk are invaluable for determining who to recommend for colonoscopy and who may be well-screened without colonoscopy according to Dr. Imperiale.

World Health Organization (WHO) statistics indicate that colorectal cancer is the third most common (after breast and lung) cancer in the world and the second (after lung) most common cause of cancer death in 2020 (935,000 deaths).

“New scoring systems for predicting advanced proximal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults with or without knowing distal colorectal findings: a prospective, cross-sectional study” is published in the European Journal of Cancer Prevention. Authors, in addition to Dr. Imperiale, are Patrick Monahan, PhD and Timothy Stump, M.S., of IU School of Medicine; and David F. Ransohoff, M.D., of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

The study, which enrolled patients between 2004 and 2011, was supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01-CA104459), Walther Cancer Foundation and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center.

About Thomas F. Imperiale, M.D.

In addition to his role as a research scientist at Regenstrief Institute, Thomas F. Imperiale, M.D., is a core investigator for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center. He is the Lawrence Lumeng Professor of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Indiana University School of Medicine and a member of the IU Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center.

About Regenstrief Institute

Founded in 1969 in Indianapolis, the Regenstrief Institute is a local, national and global leader dedicated to a world where better information empowers people to end disease and realize true health. A key research partner to Indiana University, Regenstrief and its research scientists are responsible for a growing number of major healthcare innovations and studies. Examples range from the development of global health information technology standards that enable the use and interoperability of electronic health records to improving patient-physician communications, to creating models of care that inform practice and improve the lives of patients around the globe.

Sam Regenstrief, a nationally successful entrepreneur from Connersville, Indiana, founded the institute with the goal of making healthcare more efficient and accessible for everyone. His vision continues to guide the institute’s research mission.

About IU School of Medicine

IU School of Medicine is the largest medical school in the U.S. and is annually ranked among the top medical schools in the nation by U.S. News & World Report. The school offers high-quality medical education, access to leading medical research and rich campus life in nine Indiana cities, including rural and urban locations consistently recognized for livability.

  • Dr. Thomas Imperiale

Related News

Aaron Carroll, M.D.

Call for Papers on Artificial Intelligence Applied to Pediatric Care

Published in JAMA Pediatrics. Here is a link to the article. Regenstrief Institute author: Aaron E. Carroll, M.D., M.S.

Critical gap in colorectal cancer screening process: follow-up after positive stool test

INDIANAPOLIS – Screening for colorectal cancer presents a unique opportunity unavailable for most other types of cancers. Screening allows

Eric Vachon, PhD, RN

Study explores how relationship with partner impacts breast cancer survivor’s emotional and physical well-being

Satisfaction with relationship and better agreement are linked with positive health outcomes Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer places